Woman Brutally Assaulted by Police at DNC then Arrested

August 27, 2008 at 2:15 pm (election, Free Speech, Government, History, McCain, News, obama, Uncategorized)
Tags: Freedom Speech Martial Law DNC Police Arrest Assault Wo

Martial Law at the DNC- Democratic National Camps
This one needs to be watched twice or even three times folks.
Observe the blunt force and velocity at which the baton strikes this woman. The force/velocity must be around 300-350 pounds per square inch.

Modern Definition of Martial Law:
Martial law is when military-like actions are taken upon a nations own citizens and constitutional and human rights are violated on a regular basis as part of a standard operating procedure (SOP).

It is when you cannot protest without a “permit” and your freedom of speech is silenced.

It is basically what they call a “police state”. It is when the “police” are trained by and act like federal officials/military police rather than the civilian peace keepers they are supposed to be.

It is when random AND permanent checkpoints are set up by Homeland Security and police officers like they have now all over the country especially along interstate-highway 8 and 10.

Many believe that martial law is ONLY when the actual Army and/or Marines/ National Guard patrol the streets but this is incorrect as these troops are committed in Iraq and Afghanistan and attending to the other 1100 U.S. military bases that are outside of the U.S.

Homeland Security and the local police departments have been trained by federal agents and are federal agents and in these modern times are now enforcing obvious martial law.

The days of the Army rolling down the street in tanks is over as it is unnecessary because the U.S. citizens have been pacified enough and Homeland Security and the Police have been trained and armed enough to where this would surely be over-kill.

Besides there are US National Guard bases in the majority of 30,000+ population towns and the troops are committed overseas.

A basic example of Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for martial law would be the internment camps they have set-up in Colorado in preparation for the Democratic National Convention (DNC).

If the country was not under martial law setting up these kind of warehouse-style camps which are being hidden from the media and the citizens would not be permitted by the city, county or state.

There are videos and information available on YouTube and other places on the net about these camps and I also have a video which I will attach to this one.

So this is a basic explanation of Marital Law as it exists in the 21st century.

ANOTHER indication of Martial Law enacted is:
Watch a White House press conference/interview and/or go to your local court house and peak inside a court room and look at the American Flag.

You will notice that the flag will have gold tassel around it’s borders. If you understand this and have any education in these matters you would know in fact that it is a Federal Crime to attach ANYTHING to the American Flag.

The ONLY thing that can be attached to the American Flag by Federal law under penalty of prosecution are GOLD TASSELS and they can ONLY be attached in the case of MARTIAL LAW ordered by the President of the United States of America.

Of course under martial law information, education, news, networks and the internet (as seen nightly on FOX news and CNN) are censored therefor research on this subject is not the easiest although it can be done.

There is no doubt the movement by the people is meant to be a peaceful one and that’s the ideology of the masses. But the way this government has position itself suggests a much more combative rebellion. Rex 84, Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Presidential Directive 12, the elimination of the Posse Comitatus Act, suspension habeas corpus, FISA, Presidential Directive 51, FEMA camps, The Detention of American Citizens as Enemy Combatants http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31724.pdf, the new Operation Northwoods “Iraq” and so many other policies that have limited our ability to resist what is coming. The pieces are stacked and this house of cards will fall, the manner in which is yet to be determined. The King is in his counting house, counting down, counting down, counting………

To draw a distinction between this administration and the Nazism rule not so long ago, “is” a hard line to connect. Often times it’s what is done in plain sight that often gets over looked. A certain immunity from criticism that takes place when change is implemented gradually over a long period of time. I know you’ve heard the line I use about American airport security. That it’s common place to see military force, strong police presence, Air Marshals and machine guns, and this gives Americans a sense of security. “How safe I feel,” they say, what an Orwellian thought. Oblivious that one day that same might could be turned on us, that we are just being conditioned. Did the Germans feel this same false sense of security? Are we so blind we can’t see it’s happening to us? When I think of the secret service, I see the S.S. Remember the Bush Directive 51? You know Hitler was the original author, same name, same objective. Have you read it? http://www.feldgrau.com/dir51.html http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
Through the principle of indemnity, Hitler killed 6 million Jews, so much for Homeland Security. I can’t seem to find a distinction. They both thought they were called upon by “GOD” to lead. Have you every wondered where Bush got his idea for his “faith-base initiatives” I believe it to be Hitlers January 30, 1939 speech to the Reichstag. The Fuhrer began, “Amongst the accusations which are directed against Germany in the so-called democracy is the charge that the National Socialist State is hostile to religion.” He continued, “public monies diverted from taxation through the State have been placed at the disposal of both Churches (Protestant and Catholic).” Hitler gave almost 1.8 billion Reichstag’s between 1938-39 to Christian churches.
Hitler also noted, “With a tenth of our budget for religion, we would thus have a Church devoted to the State and of unshakable loyalty. . . . the little sects, which receive only a few hundred thousand marks, are devoted to us body and soul.”

The comparisons are too numerous and with the transitory nature of our memories this time will be forgotten and the outcome that prevails will be depicted and skewed by the victors of this era. Yet call me a “hopeless optimist” {LOL} I still believe there is time to change this most dangerous course of events, but will we take up this endeavor? Recollecting Pastor Martin Niemöller’s famous poem, this is the variation I admire best.

They came first for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up.